Assertion :A laser beam of $0.3 W$ can drill a hole through metal sheet, whereas light of $1000 W$ can not do so Reason: Laser beam has very high frequency

Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Both Assertion and Reason are incorrect

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is C Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect
Assertion is correct.
Since laser is a high intensity and powerful beam, the given Reason is incorrect. The drilling of a hole has nothing to do with the power of light but the intensity.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Q. Assertion: The compressibility factor for

H_{2}

and

H e

(1 + \frac{P b}{R T})

Reason: The compressibility factor for

H_{2}

and

H e

can be derived from Van der Waal's equation.

Assertion (A) Boiling points of alcohols and ethers are high.
Reason (R) They can form intermolecular hydrogen-bonding.
(a) Assertion and reason both are correct and reason is correct explanation of assertion.
(b) Assertion and reason both are wrong statements.
(c) Assertion is correct statement but reason is wrong statement.
(d) Assertion is wrong statement but reason is correct statement.
(e) Both assertion and reason are correct statements but reason is not correct explanation of assertion.

Q. Assertion : Two electrons of helium atom are placed in only one shell but three electrons of lithium need two shells.
Reason: A shell can have maximum

{2n}^{2}

electrons.

Q. Assertion :Sulphuric acid is more viscous than water. Reason: Concentrated sulphuric acid has a great affinity for water.

Assertion (A) Order of the reaction can be zero or fractional.

Reason (R) We cannot determine order from balanced chemical equation.

(a) Both assertion and reason are correct and the reason is correct explanation of assertion
(b) Both assertion and reason are correct, but reason does not explain assertion.
(c) Assertion is correct, but reason is incorrect
(d) Both assertion and reason are incorrect
(e) Assertion is incorrect but reason is correct.

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

Assertion :A laser beam of 0.3W can drill a hole through metal sheet, whereas light of 1000W can not do so Reason: Laser beam has very high frequency

The correct option is C Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrectAssertion is correct.Since laser is a high intensity and powerful beam, the given Reason is incorrect. The drilling of a hole has nothing to do with the power of light but the intensity.

Assertion :A laser beam of $0.3 W$ can drill a hole through metal sheet, whereas light of $1000 W$ can not do so Reason: Laser beam has very high frequency

The correct option is C Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect
Assertion is correct.
Since laser is a high intensity and powerful beam, the given Reason is incorrect. The drilling of a hole has nothing to do with the power of light but the intensity.